These results, in fact, were replicated in Australian Oxford Houses (Ferrari, Jason, Blake et al., 2006). In a peer-run Oxford Model, it is nearly impossible for providers to determine the health of the house. Providers invest significant time and energy in creating a safe, sustainable discharge plan for their clients, only to recommend a home that is peer run, dirty and potentially has people using in it. The benefit of Oxford Houses is they are a very inexpensive housing resource for people in recovery. The average cost in Atlantic County New Jersey for someone to move into an Oxford House is $480.

  • An individual may receive a scholarship one time per funding year (October 1-September 30).
  • Only 6% of these costs were for general and administrative costs of Oxford House, Inc.
  • Results indicated a high sustainability rate (86.9%) during a six year period of time.
  • Equal Expense Shared (EES) is generally between 80 and 160 dollars a week and includes utilities.

Parallel to this concept lies the organizational structure of Oxford House, Inc. This publicly supported, non-profit 501(c)3 corporation is the umbrella organization which provides the network connecting all Oxford Houses and allocates resources to duplicate the Oxford House concept where needs arise. Residents must only abide by the rules of the home, but if they ever use drugs or alcohol while a resident, they are immediately evicted. Residents may stay as long as they need to, although most stay about 1 year. We provide a safe, affordable living environment that is supportive to individuals in recovery from addiction.

The Oxford House: Self-run, Self-supported Recovery Homes

Unfortunately, these TC programs often create a financial burden on society, and are not available to all that need them. Also, therapeutic community residents may stay only for a limited time before many return to former high-risk environments or stressful family situations (Goldsmith, 1992). The goal of sober living homes is to monitor and improve health, safety and wellness using peer support. The goal of many halfway houses is to reduce recidivism among felons using supervision. However, some halfway houses are designed to reduce drug relapse rates for high-risk individuals leaving incarceration. Oxford House provides safe, affordable living to individuals in recovery from alcoholism and addiction.

oxford house sober living locations

The national non-profit organization created an independent Board of Directors and World Council by electing residents and alumni from around the United States. These boards recruited experienced leadership to work with these resident-committees to develop new strategies for growth and program excellence. Oxford House, Inc has provided recovery and reentry housing for women and men since 1975, with over 2,800 locations world-wide and 11 in Connecticut.

Addiction and the Importance of Extended Care: Continuing Treatment to Achieve Long-Term Recovery

Depending on the city, neighborhood and services offered, rent can range from $300 to $2,000 per month. Some sober homes do not require residents to pay utility bills, but utilities may be rationed to avoid waste. The services, rent, rules and living conditions at sober living homes vary from place to place. Some homes are part of a behavioral health care system where residents live next to a rehab clinic, participate in outpatient therapy and have access to the clinic’s recreational activities.

  • Their responsibilities may range from randomly drug testing residents, collecting rent, and monitoring the house to more formal responsibilities, such as case management and support.
  • Join our sober living community or refer a client, family member, or friend.
  • The Office of National Drug Control Policy is currently considering recommending that primary care settings should identify people with substance abusers in primary care settings in order to refer more patients to detoxification and treatment.

There were only seventeen American Indian participants in our national NIDA study (Kidney, Alvarez, Jason, Ferrari, & Minich, 2009). Nevertheless, American Indians were no more likely to report more severe substance use, psychological problems, criminal histories, or lower incomes than other groups. In addition, American Indians were more likely to report being on parole or probation and being referred for aftercare by the legal system. Moreover, American Indians reported greater disharmony within their recovery residences than Caucasians, but there were no significant ethnic differences in length of stay in Oxford House. Other Recovery Residences have significantly more accountability and structure. The owner or paid staff may be involved in such a way that they check on the house and administer the drug tests.

People Can Change. Lives Can Change. Hope Can Be Restored.

Annualizing this difference for the entire Oxford House sample corresponds to approximately $494,000 in additional benefits to those in the Oxford House condition. The lower rate of incarceration (3% versus 9%) in the study among Oxford House versus usual care participants corresponded to annualized savings for the Oxford House sample of roughly $119,000. Together, the productivity and incarceration benefits yield an estimated $613,000 in savings accruing to the Oxford House participants. Limited research, however, is available regarding how Oxford House settings compare to other treatments.

Additionally, mutual help, social support, a sober living environment, and accountability emerged as strongly-endorsed therapeutic elements of the Oxford House model. Finally, consistent with a broad conceptualization of recovery, residents reported that living in Oxford House helped them remain sober but also facilitated the development of life skills and a new sense of purpose along with increased self-esteem. These findings provide a challenge to psychologists working in the addiction field. The missing element for many patients is supportive settings following treatment for substance abuse, and the expansion of these types of settings is an important activity for psychologists. Vaillant (1983) noted that environmental factors may be key contributors to whether or not individuals maintain abstinence, and these factors include the support one receives for abstinence among their support networks. Moos (2006 Moos (2007) pointed to other individual, biological, and socio-environmental factors that predicted abstinence maintenance.

ODMHSAS funds, both directly and through collaborative grant efforts, three recovery housing programs. Recovery Housing Scholarship – Applicants for the scholarship must have a history of opioid and/or stimulant use. All payments will be paid directly to the housing program which must be OKARR/NARR certified and MAT/MOUD accepting or an Oxford House. Under https://stylevanity.com/2023/07/top-5-questions-to-ask-yourself-when-choosing-sober-house.html special circumstances, rental and utility assistance may be provided to a scattered site rental unit with access to support services/best practices provided by a contracted ODMHSAS provider or community partners who follow best practices. (This funding may not be used for rental deposits and the individual’s rent may not be more than 30% of their income).

oxford house sober living locations